[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] sparc64: interrupt trap handling
From: |
Blue Swirl |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] sparc64: interrupt trap handling |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Jan 2010 17:00:20 +0000 |
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:19 PM, Igor V. Kovalenko
<address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Igor V. Kovalenko <address@hidden>
>
> cpu_check_irqs
> - handle SOFTINT register TICK and STICK timer bits
> - only check interrupt levels greater than PIL value
> - handle preemption by higher level traps
>
> cpu_exec
> - handle CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD only if interrupts are enabled
> - PIL 15 is not special level on sparcv9
>
> Signed-off-by: Igor V. Kovalenko <address@hidden>
> ---
> cpu-exec.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> hw/sun4u.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
> index af4595b..65192c1 100644
> --- a/cpu-exec.c
> +++ b/cpu-exec.c
> @@ -449,24 +449,28 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUState *env1)
> next_tb = 0;
> }
> #elif defined(TARGET_SPARC)
> - if ((interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) &&
> - cpu_interrupts_enabled(env)) {
> - int pil = env->interrupt_index & 15;
> - int type = env->interrupt_index & 0xf0;
> -
> - if (((type == TT_EXTINT) &&
> - (pil == 15 || pil > env->psrpil)) ||
> - type != TT_EXTINT) {
> - env->interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD;
> - env->exception_index = env->interrupt_index;
> - do_interrupt(env);
> - env->interrupt_index = 0;
> - next_tb = 0;
> - }
> - } else if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_TIMER) {
> - //do_interrupt(0, 0, 0, 0, 0);
> - env->interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_TIMER;
> - }
> + if ((interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD)) {
> + if (cpu_interrupts_enabled(env)) {
> + int pil = env->interrupt_index & 0xf;
> + int type = env->interrupt_index & 0xf0;
> +
> + if (((type == TT_EXTINT) && (pil > env->psrpil))
> ||
> + type != TT_EXTINT) {
This removes the check for level 15, which is non-maskable on V8.
> + //env->interrupt_request &=
> ~CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD;
Remove.
> + if (env->interrupt_index > 0) {
> + env->exception_index =
> env->interrupt_index;
> + do_interrupt(env);
> + next_tb = 0;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + else if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_TIMER) {
'else if' etc. should be on the same line as '}'.
> + env->interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_TIMER;
> +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> + cpu_check_irqs(env);
> +#endif
> + }
> #elif defined(TARGET_ARM)
> if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ
> && !(env->uncached_cpsr & CPSR_F)) {
> diff --git a/hw/sun4u.c b/hw/sun4u.c
> index 9d46f08..84a8043 100644
> --- a/hw/sun4u.c
> +++ b/hw/sun4u.c
> @@ -233,29 +233,51 @@ void irq_info(Monitor *mon)
>
> void cpu_check_irqs(CPUState *env)
> {
> - uint32_t pil = env->pil_in | (env->softint & ~SOFTINT_TIMER) |
> - ((env->softint & SOFTINT_TIMER) << 14);
> + uint32_t pil = env->pil_in | (env->softint & ~(SOFTINT_TM | SOFTINT_SM));
> +
> + /* check if TM or SM in SOFTINT are set
> + setting these also causes interrupt 14 */
> + if (env->softint & (SOFTINT_TM | SOFTINT_SM))
> + pil |= 1 << 14;
> +
> + if (!pil) {
> + if (env->interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD) {
> + CPUIRQ_DPRINTF("Reset CPU IRQ (current interrupt %X)\n",
> + env->interrupt_index);
> + env->interrupt_index = 0;
> + cpu_reset_interrupt(env, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
All other architectures have this code in cpu-exec.c, why move?
Uppercase hex.
> + }
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (cpu_interrupts_enabled(env)) {
>
> - if (pil && (env->interrupt_index == 0 ||
> - (env->interrupt_index & ~15) == TT_EXTINT)) {
> unsigned int i;
>
> - for (i = 15; i > 0; i--) {
> + for (i = 15; i > env->psrpil; i--) {
> if (pil & (1 << i)) {
> int old_interrupt = env->interrupt_index;
> -
> - env->interrupt_index = TT_EXTINT | i;
> - if (old_interrupt != env->interrupt_index) {
> - CPUIRQ_DPRINTF("Set CPU IRQ %d\n", i);
> - cpu_interrupt(env, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
> - }
> + int new_interrupt = TT_EXTINT | i;
> +
> + if (env->tl > 0 && cpu_tsptr(env)->tt > new_interrupt) {
> + CPUIRQ_DPRINTF("Not setting CPU IRQ: TL=%d "
> + "current %X >= pending %X\n",
> + env->tl, cpu_tsptr(env)->tt, new_interrupt);
> + }
> + else if (old_interrupt != new_interrupt) {
'else if' etc. should be on the same line as '}'.
> + env->interrupt_index = new_interrupt;
> + CPUIRQ_DPRINTF("Set CPU IRQ %d old=%X new=%X\n", i,
> + old_interrupt, new_interrupt);
> + cpu_interrupt(env, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
> + }
> break;
> }
> }
> - } else if (!pil && (env->interrupt_index & ~15) == TT_EXTINT) {
> - CPUIRQ_DPRINTF("Reset CPU IRQ %d\n", env->interrupt_index & 15);
> - env->interrupt_index = 0;
> - cpu_reset_interrupt(env, CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD);
> + }
> + else {
> + CPUIRQ_DPRINTF("Interrupts disabled, pil=%08X pil_in=%08X
> softint=%08X "
> + "current interrupt %X\n",
> + pil, env->pil_in, env->softint, env->interrupt_index);
> }
> }
Overall, it looks like there are some unnecessary changes so that it's
hard to see what is the fix.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] sparc64: check for pending irq when pil, pstate or softint is changed, (continued)
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] sparc64: move cpu_interrupts_enabled to cpu.h, Igor V. Kovalenko, 2010/01/05
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] sparc64: interrupt trap handling, Igor V. Kovalenko, 2010/01/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] sparc64: interrupt trap handling,
Blue Swirl <=