qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] target-alpha: Clean up arithmetic traps.


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] target-alpha: Clean up arithmetic traps.
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 11:24:04 -0800

Replace the EXCP_ARITH_OVERFLOW placeholder with the complete
set of bits from the EXC_SUM IPR.  Use them in the existing
places where we raise arithmetic exceptions.

Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
---
 target-alpha/cpu.h       |   10 +++++++---
 target-alpha/op_helper.c |   12 ++++++------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target-alpha/cpu.h b/target-alpha/cpu.h
index 3728d83..eda1b4a 100644
--- a/target-alpha/cpu.h
+++ b/target-alpha/cpu.h
@@ -450,9 +450,13 @@ enum {
 };
 
 /* Arithmetic exception */
-enum {
-    EXCP_ARITH_OVERFLOW,
-};
+#define EXC_M_IOV       (1<<16)         /* Integer Overflow */
+#define EXC_M_INE       (1<<15)         /* Inexact result */
+#define EXC_M_UNF       (1<<14)         /* Underflow */
+#define EXC_M_FOV       (1<<13)         /* Overflow */
+#define EXC_M_DZE       (1<<12)         /* Division by zero */
+#define EXC_M_INV       (1<<11)         /* Invalid operation */
+#define EXC_M_SWC       (1<<10)         /* Software completion */
 
 enum {
     IR_V0   = 0,
diff --git a/target-alpha/op_helper.c b/target-alpha/op_helper.c
index b2abf6c..48245dd 100644
--- a/target-alpha/op_helper.c
+++ b/target-alpha/op_helper.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ uint64_t helper_addqv (uint64_t op1, uint64_t op2)
     uint64_t tmp = op1;
     op1 += op2;
     if (unlikely((tmp ^ op2 ^ (-1ULL)) & (tmp ^ op1) & (1ULL << 63))) {
-        helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXCP_ARITH_OVERFLOW);
+        helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV);
     }
     return op1;
 }
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ uint64_t helper_addlv (uint64_t op1, uint64_t op2)
     uint64_t tmp = op1;
     op1 = (uint32_t)(op1 + op2);
     if (unlikely((tmp ^ op2 ^ (-1UL)) & (tmp ^ op1) & (1UL << 31))) {
-        helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXCP_ARITH_OVERFLOW);
+        helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV);
     }
     return op1;
 }
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ uint64_t helper_subqv (uint64_t op1, uint64_t op2)
     uint64_t res;
     res = op1 - op2;
     if (unlikely((op1 ^ op2) & (res ^ op1) & (1ULL << 63))) {
-        helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXCP_ARITH_OVERFLOW);
+        helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV);
     }
     return res;
 }
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ uint64_t helper_sublv (uint64_t op1, uint64_t op2)
     uint32_t res;
     res = op1 - op2;
     if (unlikely((op1 ^ op2) & (res ^ op1) & (1UL << 31))) {
-        helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXCP_ARITH_OVERFLOW);
+        helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV);
     }
     return res;
 }
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ uint64_t helper_mullv (uint64_t op1, uint64_t op2)
     int64_t res = (int64_t)op1 * (int64_t)op2;
 
     if (unlikely((int32_t)res != res)) {
-        helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXCP_ARITH_OVERFLOW);
+        helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV);
     }
     return (int64_t)((int32_t)res);
 }
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ uint64_t helper_mulqv (uint64_t op1, uint64_t op2)
     muls64(&tl, &th, op1, op2);
     /* If th != 0 && th != -1, then we had an overflow */
     if (unlikely((th + 1) > 1)) {
-        helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXCP_ARITH_OVERFLOW);
+        helper_excp(EXCP_ARITH, EXC_M_IOV);
     }
     return tl;
 }
-- 
1.6.5.2





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]