qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: stable-0.12 versus master branching?


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: stable-0.12 versus master branching?
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 08:35:53 -0600
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090825)

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I am really confused wrt stable 0.12 branching policy.
For example I see this, in master:

        commit d587e0787153f0224a6140c5015609963ceaabfb
        Author: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>
        Date:   Mon Dec 14 11:36:53 2009 -0600

            Revert "pci: interrupt disable bit support"

            This reverts commit 0ea5709a32085f7d14901a09d12bd35f9b267607.

            Per discussion with Michael Tsirkin, this is too risky for 0.12

            Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>

(this was cherry-picked in stable-0.12 as well).
From the comment, this revert makes sense for stable-0.12
but not for master.  Is this an attempt to keep stable and master
as close as possible? I expected master development to proceed while
stable-0.12 would get just bugfixes. No?

It was a mistake. I've already got it recommitted in master. Just need to push.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

Thanks,






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]