[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open
From: |
Yaniv Kamay |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Dec 2009 11:47:23 -0500 (EST) |
----- "Anthony Liguori" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Yaniv Kamay wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Spice project is now open, for more information visit
> http://spice-space.org,
> > due to a server relocation the site will be down during this
> weekend.
> >
> > Spice ship patched QEMU based on fairly old KVM snapshot as a
> reference
> > implementation. The Spice team plane to push all the relevant bits
> into
> > QEMU upstream.
> >
>
> Historically, we have not supported multiple display mechanisms
> favoring
> making one mechanism as good as it can be.
>
> Supporting both Spice and VNC would go against this policy. It's not
>
> outside the realm of possibility, but there has to be a good
> justification for it.
>
> We need to separate the advantages of having a paravirtual display
> driver from the advantages of a remote display protocol. For
> instance,
> VNC is capable of doing ARGB cursor offloading to the client. We do
> not
> support it in QEMU because the VGA drivers we emulate do not support
> this functionality. Likewise, VNC can support sound tunneling and
> QEMU
> does implement this (although virt-manager does not yet).
>
> So from a protocol perspective, what are the advantages of Spice over
> VNC?
>
> Obviously, the disadvantages are that for all practical purposes, it's
> a
> closed protocol. While there is now a specification, there is not a
> clear mechanism for extending it by third parties. VNC has a
> published
> protocol and there's a documented process for extending by third
> parties. There are a large number of existing VNC clients so from an
>
> interoperability perspective, VNC clearly wins.
>
> Since VNC is extensible (and we've extended it many times for QEMU),
> if
> Spice possesses unique encoding mechanisms that are advantageous, why
>
> wouldn't we just add those mechanisms to VNC as an extension?
I'm not getting into this discussion and is not going to happen, you have all
the necessary information on spiec-space.org in order to take intelligent
decision. The QEMU community can choose to reject Spice if it decide to do so.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open, Yaniv Kamay, 2009/12/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open, Anthony Liguori, 2009/12/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open, Alexander Graf, 2009/12/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open, Anthony Liguori, 2009/12/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open, Alexander Graf, 2009/12/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open, Glauber Costa, 2009/12/11
Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open, Anthony Liguori, 2009/12/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open,
Yaniv Kamay <=
Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open, Izik Eidus, 2009/12/11
Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open, Izik Eidus, 2009/12/11
Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open, Anthony Liguori, 2009/12/11
Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open, Izik Eidus, 2009/12/11