[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: Unclear committer situation
From: |
Artyom Tarasenko |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: Unclear committer situation |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Dec 2009 19:48:04 +0100 |
2009/12/2 Jan Kiszka <address@hidden>:
> Artyom Tarasenko wrote:
>> 2009/12/1 Alexander Graf <address@hidden>:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Could someone with commit rights please stand up to feel responsible for
>>> PPC?
>>>
>>> Usually, when I send a patch to qemu-devel, I know who to address to
>>> increase chances of it getting committed. For kvm/vnc/block I just CC
>>> Anthony, for Audio I just CC malc, etc.
>>
>> And who can increase chances of getting committed for a scsi-related patch?
>> I sent a patch on November, the 10th
>> (http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/38100/),
>> and it looks like it was just ignored.
>>
>
> Patch is line-wrapped (following your link to patchwork makes this obvious).
Oh. Can it be that a simultaneous inlining and attachment
(what Blue Swirl suggested few weeks ago) is not compatible with patchwork?
The patch in the attachment doesn't seem to be line-wrapped.
Will have to find a way to persuade gmail not to wrap patches.
> Note that the merge process can be quite silent. Hearing nothing for a
> while (some weeks) may also mean that your patch suddenly pops up in the
> tree - given it's clean and no one complained.
Already experienced that too. :)
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation, Artyom Tarasenko, 2009/12/02
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Unclear committer situation, Anthony Liguori, 2009/12/02
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Unclear committer situation, Artyom Tarasenko, 2009/12/03
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation, Anthony Liguori, 2009/12/02
Re: [Qemu-devel] Unclear committer situation, Anthony Liguori, 2009/12/02