Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/10] Introduce qmisc module

[Anthony Liguori]

Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 10/18/2009 04:06 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >   Integration with QObjects is a killer feature, I think it's the
> > stronger argument against grabbing one from the internet.
>
> Yeah, I'd say let's go with Anthony's stuff.  I'll rebase the encoder 
> on top of it soonish (I still think it's best if JSON encoding lies in 
> QObject like a kind of toString).  If we'll need the asynchronous 
> parsing later, we can easily replace it with mine or Vincent's.

One thing I want to add as a feature to the 0.12 release is a nice 
client API.  To have this, we'll need message boundary identification 
and a JSON encoder.  I'll focus on the message boundary identification 
today.

I'd strongly suggest making the JSON encoder live outside of QObject.  
There are many possible ways to represent a QObject.  Think of JSON as a 
view of the QObject model.  The human monitor mode representation is a 
different view.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Paolo