[Qemu-devel] commit e09a5267 (was: [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?)

[Jan Kiszka]

Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/10/2009 04:56 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>> The problem is patch volume.  We often see hundreds of patches a day. 
>> If typing a mail for each patch takes 2 minutes, that's potentially
>> hours spent just on sending these mails.
>>
> 
> You exaggerate.  The average rate is 13 patches per calendar day.  The
> bulk of the patches are in patchsets which can be acked as a set, not
> once per patch.
> 
>> What I really need is some way to automatically generate these
>> notifications.  It's pretty easy to send a mail when a patch enters
>> the queue but it's more difficult to send a mail when a patch is
>> removed from the queue via a rebase.  Often times, I remove patches
>> from the queue simply because I'm not the right path for the patches
>> to be committed from (like linux-user).
> 
> I think more per-patch attention is needed, not less, for example see
> this commit:
> 
> commit e09a5267adf0af25b55d2abaf06e288b2d9537ea
> Author: Dustin Kirkland <address@hidden>
> Date:   Thu Sep 3 12:31:33 2009 -0500
> 
>     qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running kvm without /dev/kvm, falling
> back to non-accelerated mode
> 
>     qemu-kvm: fix segfault when running kvm without /dev/kvm, falling back
>     to non-accelerated mode
> 
>     We're seeing segfaults on systems without access to /dev/kvm.  It
>     looks like the global kvm_allowed is being set just a little too late
>     in vl.c.  This patch moves the kvm initialization a bit higher in the
>     vl.c main, just after options processing, and solves the segfaults.
>     We're carrying this patch in Ubuntu 9.10 Alpha.  Please apply
>     upstream, or advise if and why this might not be the optimal solution.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <address@hidden>
> 
>     Move the kvm_init() call a bit higher to fix a segfault when
>     /dev/kvm is not available.  The kvm_allowed global needs
>     to be set correctly a little earlier.
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Dustin Kirkland <address@hidden>
>     Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>
> 
> There are many examples like this in the tree which is a pity.  Others
> include parts of an email conversation.  I'd like history to look better
> than this.

Even worse, I think this patch does not belong into upstream as it fixed
a qemu-kvm-only bug. I think this was caused by Dustin CC'ing qemu, right?

Did anyone test properly if the change has no side effects on upstream
kvm (which has a different initialization scheme)?

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux