[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: QEMU patch management
From: |
Luiz Capitulino |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: QEMU patch management |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Sep 2009 10:11:48 -0300 |
On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:51:09 +0200
Reimar Döffinger <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 09:29:38AM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:31:21 +0530
> > Amit Shah <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > It can easily be done. The process has to scale considering the number
> > > of submissions we're seeing.
> >
> > I agree, with more maintainers QEMU would evolve a lot faster and I think
> > this is becoming an issue.
> >
> > On the other hand I don't think we will have them by distributing
> > responsibilities, those interested should setup a tree and
> > start collecting patches.
>
> You're saying that just like that, but if you just set up your own tree,
> at least if you are not a git guru you end up with the same mess as I
> have now:
> The official qemu git tree, Stefan Weil's git tree and the kvm tree, all
> have slightly different eepro100 code and for each one I have to do
> merges since I have no idea which path has a chance to get patches
> accepted (since after all I got no response anywhere).
This is a sightly different problem that is related to the fact
that qemu is forked.
> For me that is simply too much effort (I am after all a FFmpeg/MPlayer
> developer
> in the first place) and I'll probably just drop all the non-trivial
> changes I made because they have a too high merging effort.
Not sure if this is what you meant but, having different trees for
different subsystems is one of the best ways to get large scale
development and that's how git was designed to work.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Anthony Liguori, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Avi Kivity, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Bernhard Kauer, 2009/09/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Amit Shah, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Reimar Döffinger, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Amit Shah, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Luiz Capitulino, 2009/09/10
- [Qemu-devel] QEMU patch management, Amit Shah, 2009/09/10
- [Qemu-devel] Re: QEMU patch management, Luiz Capitulino, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: QEMU patch management, Reimar Döffinger, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: QEMU patch management,
Luiz Capitulino <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: QEMU patch management, Reimar Döffinger, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Anthony Liguori, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Anthony Liguori, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Amit Shah, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Anthony Liguori, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Amit Shah, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Avi Kivity, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Anthony Liguori, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Avi Kivity, 2009/09/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] [RESEND2] Qemu unmaintained?, Anthony Liguori, 2009/09/10