Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.07.2009, at 14:57, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Alexander Graf wrote:
On 24.07.2009, at 13:51, Jan Kiszka wrote:
[...]
There are no 32-bit PowerPC KVM kernels that can do dirty logging.
By design or by lack of implementation?
Lack of implementation.
And what if some other arch with support for both pops up? #ifdef
HOST_PPC is no long-term solutions. And I see no need to install a
temporary workaround given the currently existing kernel support.
I'd like to have the qemu bits sorted out while polishing the kvm
parts,
so when kvm support shows up mainline there's a working userspace
part.
I understand. But the risk is that what you submit to qemu and kvm may
receive different reviews and finally look different. So for stuff
which
concerns not yet existing (or fully implemented) interfaces, the other
way around is better. Specifically if there is a "risk" that it makes
into a qemu release before the corresponding kernel bits are official.