[Qemu-devel] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] xen: pv domain support.

[Mark Johnson]

Hi Ian,

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 11:25 AM, Ian Jackson <address@hidden> wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] xen: pv domain support."):
>> Next round, addressing review comments:
> ...
>> Ian, is just pulling from git fine with you?  Or do you want the
>> qemu-xen patches mailed to xen-devel?
>
> I think that for form's sake it would be good for you to mail the
> patches to xen-devel but I'm happy to pull.  So ideally a patch series
> submission which says `here are the diffs 0/n and also a git URL'.
> Is that a lot of work for you ?  If so I can probably produce such a
> series of emails myself but I think since you're the originator of
> these patches I think it would make more sense for you to do it.
>
> Thanks for your contributions.  I'm definitely keen to have them and
> I'll be branching qemu-xen so that I can take your changes now rather
> than waiting for the Xen 3.4 release freeze to end.

Do you have an idea when you expect to push these to qemu-unstable?



Thanks,


MRJ



> It's good that you're posting this code to qemu-devel and getting
> review there.  But I'd like the qemu developers to hold off committing
> these changes to their tree until the files which are being added are
> 100% identical in Gerd's patch series to in qemu-xen-unstable.
>
> That way qemu upstream will remain directly mergeable into
> qemu-xen-unstable because the code in the new files will be identical.
> Anything else will make my life very painful.
>
> To make this happen I'm of course happy to take patches to make sure
> that the code which is in qemu-xen-unstable is in the form that qemu
> upstream want it for merging.
>
> Ian.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>