[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: questions on default_config_write in hw/pci.c
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: questions on default_config_write in hw/pci.c |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:29:55 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 02:15:26PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 07:15:08PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I've been looking at hw/pci.c, specifically at how config
> > read/write are implemented, and have a couple of questions
> > about default_config_write:
> >
> > 1. The code at the beginning (if len == 4 ...)
> > seems to only update pci base registers if a dword write
> > is performed. I think it's legal for the guest to perform 4
> > single-byte writes. Should this be supported?
> >
> > 2. The large switch statement at the end of this function
> > uses hard-coded register offsets. Would it make sense
> > to change it to use macros from hw/pci.h?
> >
> > 3. Still there I see:
> > switch(d->config[0x0e]) {
> > case 0x00:
> > case 0x80:
> > register 0x0e is header type, which has defined values
> > of 0x00 (device or host bridge), 0x01 (pci to pci bridge) and
> > 0x02 (cardbus bridge). What is 0x80 and when is it used?
> > Would it make sense to remove this?
>
> Don't know. Check the PCI spec?
That's the first thing I did :) What I site above is from there:
"The Header Type field (located at offset 0Eh) defines what layout is
provided. Currently three Header Types are defined, 00h which has the
layout shown in Figure 6-1, 01h which is defined for PCI-to-PCI bridges
and is documented in the PCI to PCI Bridge Architecture Specification,
and 02h which is defined for CardBus bridges and is documented in the PC
Card Standard."
> > 4. Still there, there's some handling done for type 1 devices.
> > This support seems imcomplete.
> > Are there any PCI-to-PCI bridges emulated by qemu?
> > Would it make sense to remove this code?
>
>
> It did work at one point:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg16647.html
Sigh. I guess I'll have to fix it rather than just rip it out then ...
What I refer to first of all is that writes to BAR registers go through
logic for regular PCI devices, which have a different layout.
Does this make sense for some reason?
--
MST