[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Question about KVM and PC speaker
From: |
Jan Kiszka |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Question about KVM and PC speaker |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:29:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Huh, it is! Then the problem is a KVM-only thing: The kernel part hooks
>> onto those resources but doesn't communicate changes to this user space
>> backend.
>>
>
> In this case, the -no-kvm-pit option should help.
Probably fine in many cases (where the PIT is no longer used anyway),
just a bit unintuitive for users.
I wonder why KVM moved port 0x61 handling into kernel space at all. By
leaving it in pcspk hands and extending the latter to sync with the
in-kernel PIT on sample generation, this speaker regression (of
kvm-userspace) should have been avoidable.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT SE 2
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
- [Qemu-devel] Question about KVM and PC speaker, Simon Bienlein, 2009/04/22
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Question about KVM and PC speaker, Jan Kiszka, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Question about KVM and PC speaker, Samuel Thibault, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Question about KVM and PC speaker, Jan Kiszka, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Question about KVM and PC speaker, Samuel Thibault, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Question about KVM and PC speaker, Jan Kiszka, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Question about KVM and PC speaker, Avi Kivity, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Question about KVM and PC speaker,
Jan Kiszka <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Question about KVM and PC speaker, Avi Kivity, 2009/04/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Question about KVM and PC speaker, Jan Kiszka, 2009/04/23