qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] index out of bounds in qemu-0.10.2


From: andrzej zaborowski
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] index out of bounds in qemu-0.10.2
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 02:23:11 +0200

2009/4/18 Blue Swirl <address@hidden>:
> On 4/17/09, Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>  I am compiling qemu-0.10.2 using the attached autogenerated 'configure'
>>  wrapper (if anybody is interested in 'configure' command line options I'm
>>  using_.
>>
>>  I am using self-built gcc-4.3.3, my OS is SUSE 10.3, 32 bits.
>>
>>  While running 'make' I've noticed this:
>>
>>      41 /mnt/sdb8/sergei/AFSWD_debug/build/qemu-0.10.2/hw/twl92230.c: In 
>> function ‘menelaus_load’:
>>      42 /mnt/sdb8/sergei/AFSWD_debug/build/qemu-0.10.2/hw/hw.h:114: warning: 
>> array subscript is above array bounds
>>      43 /mnt/sdb8/sergei/AFSWD_debug/build/qemu-0.10.2/hw/hw.h:114: warning: 
>> array subscript is above array bounds
>>      44 /mnt/sdb8/sergei/AFSWD_debug/build/qemu-0.10.2/hw/hw.h:114: warning: 
>> array subscript is above array bounds
>>      45 /mnt/sdb8/sergei/AFSWD_debug/build/qemu-0.10.2/hw/twl92230.c: In 
>> function ‘menelaus_save’:
>>      46 /mnt/sdb8/sergei/AFSWD_debug/build/qemu-0.10.2/hw/hw.h:94: warning: 
>> array subscript is above array bounds
>>      47 /mnt/sdb8/sergei/AFSWD_debug/build/qemu-0.10.2/hw/hw.h:94: warning: 
>> array subscript is above array bounds
>>      48 /mnt/sdb8/sergei/AFSWD_debug/build/qemu-0.10.2/hw/hw.h:94: warning: 
>> array subscript is above array bounds
>>  .
>>
>>  Once I had the same warnings compiling my own code, and 'gcc' was correct,
>>  so most likely it's correct in this case too.
>>
>>  If so, please fix this.
>
> My gcc and even sparse is completely silent, strange.
>
> It's because of this area:
>
>    uint8_t dcdc[3];
>
> is saved like this:
>
>    qemu_put_8s(f, &s->dcdc[3]);
>    qemu_put_8s(f, &s->dcdc[3]);
>    qemu_put_8s(f, &s->dcdc[3]);
>
> and loaded like this:
>
>    qemu_get_8s(f, &s->dcdc[3]);
>    qemu_get_8s(f, &s->dcdc[3]);
>    qemu_get_8s(f, &s->dcdc[3]);

Oops, good catch, I'll correct the indexes.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]