[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] Two-Level IOPort Lookup
From: |
Brian Wheeler |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] Two-Level IOPort Lookup |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:57:42 -0400 |
On Mon, 2009-04-13 at 18:40 +0400, malc wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Apr 2009, Brian Wheeler wrote:
>
> > I've fixed a few things:
> > * my pointer arithmetic was gross looking, so I fixed it
> > * added an allocated page count for stats when debugging
> >
> >
> > On my platform (x86-64) the in-tree implementation allocates 3.5M for
> > the PC target. With this implementation the PC target consumes 2K of
> > pointer table + 256K of malloc'd memory.
> >
> > For the Alpha target, statically allocating all 24-bits worth of ioport
> > tables is about 1G of ram. With this patch, it uses 32K for the pointer
> > table and 512K of malloc'd memory
> >
> > Is there anything else I need to look at before this patch is worthy of
> > inclusion?
> >
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Wheeler <address@hidden>
> >
> > Index: vl.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- vl.c (revision 7097)
> > +++ vl.c (working copy)
> > @@ -168,8 +168,8 @@
> > //#define DEBUG_IOPORT
> > //#define DEBUG_NET
> > //#define DEBUG_SLIRP
> > +//#define DEBUG_IOPORT_FIND
> >
> > -
> > #ifdef DEBUG_IOPORT
> > # define LOG_IOPORT(...) qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_IOPORT, ## __VA_ARGS__)
> > #else
> > @@ -184,14 +184,31 @@
> > /* Max number of bluetooth switches on the commandline. */
> > #define MAX_BT_CMDLINE 10
> >
> > -/* XXX: use a two level table to limit memory usage */
> > -#define MAX_IOPORTS 65536
> > -
> > const char *bios_dir = CONFIG_QEMU_SHAREDIR;
> > const char *bios_name = NULL;
> > -static void *ioport_opaque[MAX_IOPORTS];
> > -static IOPortReadFunc *ioport_read_table[3][MAX_IOPORTS];
> > -static IOPortWriteFunc *ioport_write_table[3][MAX_IOPORTS];
> > +
> > +struct ioport {
> > + void *opaque;
> > + IOPortReadFunc *read[3];
> > + IOPortWriteFunc *write[3];
> > + void *pad;
> > +};
> > +typedef struct ioport ioport_t;
>
> Please do not use _t.
>
Ah, I missed that part in the CODING_STYLE document. I've now called it
IOPort
> [..snip..]
>
> > +static inline ioport_t *ioport_find(uint32_t address, int allocate)
> > +{
> > + uint32_t page = (address & IOPORT_PAGEMASK) >> IOPORT_PAGEBITS;
> > + uint32_t entry = address & IOPORT_ENTRYMASK;
> > +#ifdef DEBUG_IOPORT_FIND
> > + static int page_count = 0;
> > + if (address >= (1<<IOPORT_MAXBITS)) {
> > + hw_error("Maximum port # for this architecture is %d. "
> ^ extra space?
>
> [..snip..]
>
Not really, since the next line is a continuation of the string (to meet
the 80-char-wide rule) and that ends a sentence.
> > for(i = start; i < start + length; i += size) {
> > - ioport_read_table[bsize][i] = func;
> > - if (ioport_opaque[i] != NULL && ioport_opaque[i] != opaque)
> > + ioport_t *p = ioport_find(i, 1);
>
> Indentation appears messed up.
>
> [..snip..]
>
Sigh, yeah.
A new patch is forthcoming.
Brian