qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: Release 0.10.1 of QEMU


From: Felipe Contreras
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] ANNOUNCE: Release 0.10.1 of QEMU
Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2009 14:08:14 +0300

On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:25 AM, Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
> The QEMU team is pleased to announce the availability of the 0.10.1 release.
>  This is a stable release of the 0.10 tree and contains only bug fixes since
> the 0.10.0.  The attached Changelog includes all of the changes that have
> went in since 0.10.0.
>
> It can be downloaded from Savannah at:
>
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/qemu/qemu-0.10.1.tar.gz
>
> It may take a couple hours for the Savannah mirrors to update so if you get
> an error, try again later.

You forgot this one:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2009-03/msg00315.html

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Paul Brook <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [6735] The _exit syscall is used for both
thread  termination in NPTL applications ,
To: Felipe Contreras <address@hidden>
Cc: Aurelien Jarno <address@hidden>


> >>> The _exit syscall is used for both thread termination in NPTL
> >>> applications, and process termination in legacy applications.  Try to
> >>> guess which we want based on the presence of multiple threads.
> >>>
> >>> Also implement locking when modifying the CPU list.
> >>
> >> This fixes a regression in arm-linux-user,

I'm not so sure this is really a regression. Multithreaded applications never
worked.

> >> it should be pushed into the stable branch, right?
> >
> > If it fixes something *and* if there is no risk of regression, yes. But
> > I am not the one able to decide. Paul Brook is the person to ask.

There's always a risk of a regression.
I suspect this change is probably fairly safe though.

Paul


-- 
Felipe Contreras




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]