[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS
From: |
Stefano Stabellini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:19:58 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505) |
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> after the recent introduction of dma_buf_prepare we stopped honoring
>> IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS (the guest can issue dma requests with a greater
>> total length than IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS).
>> This patch adds the IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS limit back in place.
>>
>> Comments are welcome.
>>
>
> Aren't 64K sector requests legal?
>
> Looking at ide_cmd_lba48_transform().
>
I am not sure about that, but I would think not since we define
MAX_MULT_SECTORS 16
If I change MAX_MULT_SECTORS, am I supposed to see smaller dma requests?
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS, Avi Kivity, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS,
Stefano Stabellini <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS, Avi Kivity, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS, Avi Kivity, 2009/03/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/03/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS, Avi Kivity, 2009/03/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/03/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS, Avi Kivity, 2009/03/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/03/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] honor IDE_DMA_BUF_SECTORS, Samuel Thibault, 2009/03/26