[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc.
From: |
Blue Swirl |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc. |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Mar 2009 11:32:30 +0200 |
On 3/19/09, Blue Swirl <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 3/19/09, Rob Landley <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 18 March 2009 14:11:19 Blue Swirl wrote:
> > > On 3/18/09, Rob Landley <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 18 March 2009 03:41:05 Alexander Graf wrote:
> > > > > On 18.03.2009, at 00:57, Rob Landley wrote:
> > > > > > Up through svn 6657, I could boot a powerpc kernel with -kernel.
> > > > > > That commit
> > > > > > changed it so now it says:
> > > > > > invalid/unsupported opcode: 00 - 00 - 00 (00000000) fff18f00 1
> > > > > > invalid/unsupported opcode: 00 - 00 - 00 (00000000) fff18f04 1
> > > > > > invalid/unsupported opcode: 00 - 0c - 06 (00009198) 00009214 0
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And dies.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can grab a test kernel from http://landley.net/zImage-powerpc
> > > > > > and try
> > > > > > booting it (out of the qemu source directory, this is assuming
> > > > > > you've built it
> > > > > > but haven't installed it yet) via:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ppc-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc -kernel zImage-powerpc \
> > > > > > -append "console=ttyS0 panic=1" -nographic -no-reboot -L pc-bios
> > > > > >
> > > > > > With svn 6657, it works. (You get kernel boot messages up until
> it
> > > > > > panics and
> > > > > > dies because it can't find the root filesystem). With 6658 it
> dies
> > > > > > immediately with the above error message.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Unfortunately, this means that the 0.10.0 release doesn't work
> for
> > > > > > powerpc for
> > > > > > me, but svn a couple days _before_ the release did.
> > > > >
> > > > > That specific commit shouldn't have changed anything with respect
> to
> > > > > ppc32 emulation. The one where your command broken is the openBIOS
> > > > > update.
> > > >
> > > > The commit I pointed to is the openbios update, yes.
> > > >
> > > > > Please try again without -nographic.
> > > >
> > > > It does indeed work without nographic. (It doesn't do anything
> _useful_
> > > > for me without nographic, since I'm scripting the emulated kernel's
> > > > behavior through stdin and stdout, but allowing it to pop up an SDL
> > > > window does make it out of openbios and into the kernel.)
> > >
> > > The kernel makes the equivalent of the following calls to OF interface:
> > > finddevice("/") = 0x11d5c
> > > finddevice("/chosen") = 0x1197c
> > > finddevice("/openprom") = 0x11b3c
> > > getprop(0x11b3c, "model", 0x78efeb0, 0x40) = 0xf
> > > getprop(0x11d5c, "stdout", 0x78efea0, 0x4) = 0x4
> > > instance-to-path(0x86ea0, 0x12ad0dc, 0xff) where it crashes because
> > > memmove overwrites all memory.
> > >
> > > But where does this 0x86ea0 come from?
> >
> >
> > No idea, but it worked with the previous openbios, and without --nographic.
> > This is a 2.6.28.8 kernel built with the attached .config.
> >
> > By the way, while binary searching the openbios repository to figure out
> > exactly what commit between 450 and 463 actually caused it to stop
> working,
> > and I hit a fun little OpenBios hiccup in the top level Makefile of
> current
> > OpenBios svn:
> >
> > build:
> > @printf "Building..."
> > @for dir in $(ODIRS); do \
> > $(MAKE) -C $$dir > $$dir/build.log 2>&1 && echo "ok." || \
> > ( echo "error:"; tail -15 $$$dir/build.log; exit 1 ) \
> > done
> >
> > You have one too many $ before dir/build.log in the error message, so the
> > error message you get is
> >
> > Building...error:
> > tail: cannot open `/build.log' for reading: No such file or directory
> > make: *** [build] Error 1
>
>
> I must always have used build-verbose. Should be fixed soon.
>
>
> > Which took about 15 minutes of head scratching for a newbie like me to
> track
> > down. (The actual problem was that your
> config/examples/cross-ppc_rules.xml
> > hardwires TARGET=powerpc-linux-gnu- and my cross compiler just uses
> powerpc-
> > as the prefix, and overriding TARGET on the make command line doesn't work
> > because you use recursive make, and you aren't doing the ?= conditional
> > assignments that won't overwrite existing environment variable values. I
> more
> > or less expected it and was running the thing the first time so it would
> tell
> > me what cross compiler name it expected when it died unable to find it.
> Easy
> > enough to fix by just editing the darn file, but a mention of it in the
> README
> > wouldn't go amiss...)
>
>
> But my tools also use different prefix, powerpc-elf-
> (powerpc-unknown-elf). I compile using:
>
> make build-verbose TARGET=powerpc-elf-
>
> without problems.
>
> About the OpenBIOS problem, I've done further debugging. The crash can
> be reproduced with (-nographic -prom-env auto-boot?=false):
> 0 > cd /chosen ok
> 0 > .properties
> name "chosen"
> stdin 86904
> stdout 86a08
> memory 86da0
> mmu 867e8
> display 86660
> nvram 86750
> rtc 86d3c
> ok
> 0 > 86904 get-instance-path type invalid/unsupported opcode: 00 - 00
> - 00 (00000000) fff18f04 1
> invalid/unsupported opcode: 00 - 00 - 00 (00000000) fff18f08 1
> invalid bits: 00400000 for opcode: 0b - 19 - 15 (2d746572) 00009230
>
> But other nodes crash too:
> 0 > 86da0 get-instance-path type /address@hidden ok
> 0 > 86660 get-instance-path type /address@hidden/QEMU,address@hidden ok
> 0 > 86750 get-instance-path type invalid/unsupported opcode: 00 - 00
> - 00 (00000000) fff18f04 1
> invalid/unsupported opcode: 00 - 00 - 00 (00000000) fff18f08 1
> invalid bits: 00400000 for opcode: 0b - 19 - 15 (2d746572) 00009230
>
> 0 > 86d3c get-instance-path type invalid/unsupported opcode: 00 - 00
> - 00 (00000000) fff18f04 1
> invalid/unsupported opcode: 00 - 00 - 00 (00000000) fff18f08 1
> invalid bits: 00400000 for opcode: 0b - 19 - 15 (2d746572) 00009230
>
> Sparc32 doesn't crash:
> 0 > cd /chosen ok
> 0 > .properties
> name "chosen"
> stdin ffda1824
> stdout ffda18c0
> memory ffda1a88
> mmu 0
> screen ffda1a28
> ok
> 0 > ffda1824 get-instance-path type /obio/address@hidden,100000:a ok
> 0 > ffda18c0 get-instance-path type /obio/address@hidden,100000:a ok
> 0 > ffda1a28 get-instance-path type
> /address@hidden,10000000/address@hidden,10001000/SUNW,address@hidden,800000
> ok
> 0 > ffda1a88 get-instance-path type /address@hidden,0 ok
I accidentally (by using a wrong variable in a more complex patch)
found out a workaround for the bug, now -nographic boot works. But
still the other nodes have the same problem as before and the
workaround removes the "reg" node which is present on real tree.
Now the escc node doesn't have the address appended:
1bfac /address@hidden/address@hidden/address@hidden (nvram)
1c1c0 /address@hidden/address@hidden/escc (escc)
1c2ac /address@hidden/address@hidden/escc/address@hidden (serial)
1c52c /address@hidden/address@hidden/escc/address@hidden (serial)
Maybe nodes under /pci/mac-io should use custom
encode-unit/decode-unit methods instead of PCI ones?
fix_ppc_nographic.diff
Description: plain/text
- [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Rob Landley, 2009/03/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Alexander Graf, 2009/03/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Rob Landley, 2009/03/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Blue Swirl, 2009/03/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Rob Landley, 2009/03/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Blue Swirl, 2009/03/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Rob Landley, 2009/03/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Blue Swirl, 2009/03/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc.,
Blue Swirl <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Rob Landley, 2009/03/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Blue Swirl, 2009/03/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Blue Swirl, 2009/03/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Rob Landley, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Anthony Liguori, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Anthony Liguori, 2009/03/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., M. Warner Losh, 2009/03/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Blue Swirl, 2009/03/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Anthony Liguori, 2009/03/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] svn 6658 broke powerpc., Rob Landley, 2009/03/28