[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration
From: |
Jamie Lokier |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:38:20 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Paul Brook wrote:
> I suspect that in practice live migration of a VM between different qemu
> versions ends up comparable to in-place live kernel upgrades. i.e. it takes
> an awful lot of work and care to make it happen, and in practice isn't going
> to happen for any particularly useful span of versions.
On the other hand, stored snapshots of guests which are ready to run
in a particular state are quite useful. I'm under the impression the
migration code is/will be useful for storing snapshots of system (not
disk) state too. Is that right?
-- Jamie
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Andre Przywara, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Anthony Liguori, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Paul Brook, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration,
Jamie Lokier <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Paul Brook, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Jamie Lokier, 2009/02/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Paul Brook, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Jamie Lokier, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Paul Brook, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Anthony Liguori, 2009/02/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Avi Kivity, 2009/02/24
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] More robust migration, Jamie Lokier, 2009/02/20
[Qemu-devel] Re: [RFC] More robust migration, Charles Duffy, 2009/02/20