[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels
From: |
malc |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:17:00 +0300 (MSK) |
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> malc wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009, Alexey Eremenko wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Stefano Stabellini
> >> <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>> Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >>>>> Do you see the problem only on X11 remote?
> >>>>> How bad is on vnc?
> >>>>>
> >>>> vnc regresses in exactly the same way.
> >>>>
> >> Well, in my experience both local X11 and VNC are fast in KVM-84.
> >>
> >> But remote X11/SDL performance plunged below usable levels.
> >
> > FWIW same thing happened to Mac OS X + SDL.
> >
>
>
> Are you talking about SDL local?
Yes.
> If so, is your host a big endian machine and the guest a little endian?
Yes.
> What is the color depth and bpp of the guest (I assume that the host is
> 32bpp)?
Guest is in VGA mode3 (i.e. POST screen and DOS prompt)
> As usual two good tests are to check the vnc case and a guest in 32bpp too.
This doesn't happen on the very same machine running very same guest but
host OS being Linux.
--
mailto:address@hidden
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Alexey Eremenko, 2009/02/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Avi Kivity, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Avi Kivity, 2009/02/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Avi Kivity, 2009/02/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Alexey Eremenko, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, malc, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels,
malc <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Alexey Eremenko, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, malc, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, malc, 2009/02/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, malc, 2009/02/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Paul Brook, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Stefano Stabellini, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, Paul Brook, 2009/02/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu 2D performance plunges below acceptable levels, malc, 2009/02/20