Re: [Qemu-devel] first tests of qemu svn r5646 on FreeBSD - usb still slow, bsd-user doesn't build, some warnings...

[Juergen Lock]

On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 05:37:37PM +0100, I wrote:
> In article <address@hidden> you write:
> >On 11/7/08, Juergen Lock <address@hidden> wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >>   I just prepared another experimental emulators/qemu-devel port update,
> >>         http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/qemu/qemu-devel-20081107.patch
> >>  I haven't tested it that much yet (you are welcome to help there! :)
> >>  but so far didn't notice much changes compared to last time (r5499),
> >>  usb is still slow with my Linux 2.6.26 guest (probably to be expected,
> >>  nothing committed there since.)
> >
> >The patch is against a bunch of patches, which makes it hard to see
> >what has really changed. Could you make an updated set of patches
> >available somewhere? At least osdep.c and qemu-char.c patches look
> >reasonable enough to be committed.
> >
> I'll add a shar of the 20081107 qemu-devel port's files/*patch* below,
> (yes most of these probably shouldn't be merged...  The ones named *-patch
> are conditionally applied depending on user-set OPTIONS.)
> 
>  Oh and btw the osdep.c patch was already posted here, see
>       http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2008-10/msg00038.html
> 
> >>   In other news: The new sparc64-bsd-user target doesn't build because
> >>  SYSCALL_G7RFLAG and SYSCALL_G2RFLAG are undefined, and I noticed a few
> >>  warnings that may be interesting:
> >
> >The attached patch should fix the undefined flag problem, please test.
> 
>  Nope, still two of them left at line 219ff. :)
> 
>  Here comes the shar:
> 
> # This is a shell archive.  Save it in a file, remove anything before
> # this line, and then unpack it by entering "sh file".  Note, it may
> # create directories; files and directories will be owned by you and
> # have default permissions.
> #
> # This archive contains:
> #
> #     files/
> #     files/cdrom-dma-patch
> #     files/patch-90_security
> #     files/patch-CVE-2008-0928
> #     files/patch-CVE-2008-4539
> #     files/patch-Makefile
> #     files/patch-aa
> #     files/patch-ac
> #     files/patch-audio-4
> #     files/patch-audio-sdlaudio.c
> #     files/patch-bc
> #     files/patch-bd
> #     files/patch-be
> #     files/patch-bf
> #     files/patch-bg
> #     files/patch-block.c
> #     files/patch-bsdusb.patch
> #     files/patch-bt
> #     files/patch-configure
> #     files/patch-cpu-exec.c
> #     files/patch-emulate-aio
> #     files/patch-exec-all.h
> #     files/patch-exec.c
> #     files/patch-fbsd
> #     files/patch-fix_bsd_user_fbsd
        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 Ooops, ignore this one, leftover from testing...

 (And btw you can ignore the 0 byte ones too, they were just for generating
diffs easier.)

 Sorry,
        Juergen