Hi,
On Mon, 6 Oct 2008, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
P.S.: before somebody says that GCC is C99 compliant: search the
mailing list for the Beos GCC2 issue which was mentioned not long ago.
GCC is sufficiently C99 compliant to handle this style of initializers.
Maybe it's not C99 compliant enough for other stuff, but on this front
it does just fine.
I just wish you would have researched a bit better. (And no, adding to
the pile does not make your intention any better.)
Nobody ever disputed that _you_ have no problem with your patch.