qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add inotify syscalls


From: Riku Voipio
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] add inotify syscalls
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:37:45 +0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 11:08:07AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 10:45:50PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> > Inotify syscall implementation lifted from scratchbox.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Riku Voipio <address@hidden>
> > -- 
> > "rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups
> 
> > Index: trunk/linux-user/syscall.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- trunk.orig/linux-user/syscall.c 2008-09-17 22:08:51.000000000 +0300
> > +++ trunk/linux-user/syscall.c      2008-09-17 22:12:04.000000000 +0300
> > @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> >  #include <time.h>
> >  #include <limits.h>
> >  #include <sys/types.h>
> > +#include <sys/inotify.h>
> >  #include <sys/ipc.h>
> >  #include <sys/msg.h>
> >  #include <sys/wait.h>
> > @@ -5821,7 +5822,23 @@
> >          ret = do_futex(arg1, arg2, arg3, arg4, arg5, arg6);
> >          break;
> >  #endif
> > -
> > +#ifdef TARGET_NR_inotify_init
> > +    case TARGET_NR_inotify_init:
> > +        ret = get_errno(inotify_init());
> > +        break;
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef TARGET_NR_inotify_add_watch
> > +    case TARGET_NR_inotify_add_watch:
> > +        p = lock_user_string(arg2);
> > +        ret = get_errno(inotify_add_watch(arg1, path(p), arg3));
> > +        unlock_user(p, arg2, 0);
> > +        break;
> > +#endif
> > +#ifdef TARGET_NR_inotify_rm_watch
> > +    case TARGET_NR_inotify_rm_watch:
> > +        ret = get_errno(inotify_rm_watch(arg1, arg2));
> > +        break;
> > +#endif
> >      default:
> >      unimplemented:
> >          gemu_log("qemu: Unsupported syscall: %d\n", num);
> 
> 
> This syscalls like *at introduced in glibc 2.4. So you should use
> _syscall* macros for backward compatible.

Right, will fix in a moment


-- 
"rm -rf" only sounds scary if you don't have backups




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]