qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [5083] PPC: Switch a few instructions to TCG


From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [5083] PPC: Switch a few instructions to TCG
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:27:56 +0200


Am 25.08.2008 um 00:08 schrieb J. Mayer:

On Sun, 2008-08-24 at 19:05 +0000, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Revision: 5083
         http://svn.sv.gnu.org/viewvc/?view=rev&root=qemu&revision=5083
Author:   aurel32
Date:     2008-08-24 19:05:35 +0000 (Sun, 24 Aug 2008)

Log Message:
-----------
PPC: Switch a few instructions to TCG

It seems like you forgot to consider that I might be working on this
subject, as I announced here last month and care if you break my work in
any way.
Then, you also "forgot" to wait for the fixes needed to address
regression that have been introduced by previous inconsidered commits in
PowerPC emulation: I also said that this was the _first thing_ to be
done before anything else in PowePC code.
Then, I can be sure that you "forgot" to test if your patch breaks any
PowerPC targets, as some do not run now...

Excuse me, I have not been able to run Linux on a single ppc target within the last _year_. Something is severely broken all that time, not just now.

Last but not least, you also "forgot" to submit your patch, wait for
comments, reviews, tests...

All this is unacceptable;

As reported by René some months ago, you submitted a binary OHW update (r3309) but neither updated the source on your website nor QEMU's diff against it. Probably you just forgot, but don't be so harsh to others then. It's good to see that someone still cares about the PowerPC targets at all! Apart from Laurent, no one cared to review his OHW patch since then (not even complaining that it's whitespace-damaged). Nor did anyone complain that the PowerPC 'patch' by Salvatore was no patch at all but a gzipped tarball of apparently modified 0.9.1 source files - not yet reviewed at all this month.

Last month you actually said you were *planning* to port Alpha and PowerPC, with Alpha first, but had no time and reference hardware - your last commit is over half a year ago, so since there were no Alpha commits no one would expect you to work on PowerPC already given your statement. Most conversions to TCG (including the original introduction) were done without testing periods, step-by-step on trunk. Please don't fight over who's code gets committed, rather combine your efforts to get ppc usable again. If you'd post a link to your branch with work-in-progress like malc does that might help keep collisions low.

Thanks,
Andreas





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]