[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qe
From: |
Blue Swirl |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Aug 2008 18:06:07 +0300 |
On 8/7/08, Gerd Hoffmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Samuel Thibault, le Wed 06 Aug 2008 15:25:26 +0100, a écrit :
> >> Pushing the cleaning changes to Xen first can be done and would entail
> >> much easier to tackle breakage, and the merge back from qemu would then
> >> be trivial, why not doing so?
> >
> > You didn't answer that part. Really, my only concern is about having
> > things tested. Isn't it possible for instance to just merge the backend
> > core (and console/xenfb updates) in Ian's tree first for a start?
>
>
> http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/patches/qemu-xen/
>
> I didn't touch the build system, it is even more scary than the qemu one
> alone, I just set CONFIG_XEN unconditionally.
>
> I also largely left vl.c as-is, so xend shouldn't need any changes. The
> -domid switch sets an additional (redundant) variable, to keep the
> amount of changes as small as possible for now. Also -name and
> -domain-name are aliased, both set qemu_name and domain_name.
0004-xenpv-groundwork.patch
You dropped nodisk_ok support from vl.c.
0005-xen-backend-core.patch
container_of could go to osdep.h.
0006-xen-console-backend.patch
Not your fault, but a lot of places (at least ps2.c and
slavio_serial.c) define some kind of ring buffers. Maybe these could
be consolidated some time.
0007-xen-framebuffer-backend.patch
After you optimized scancode2linux[], it looks like
atkbd_set2_keycode[] and atkbd_unxlate_table[] are not needed.
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Gerd Hoffmann, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Samuel Thibault, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Gerd Hoffmann, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Samuel Thibault, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Samuel Thibault, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Samuel Thibault, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Samuel Thibault, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Gerd Hoffmann, 2008/08/11
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Stefano Stabellini, 2008/08/11
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Ian Jackson, 2008/08/11
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu,
Blue Swirl <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Samuel Thibault, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Samuel Thibault, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Gerd Hoffmann, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Blue Swirl, 2008/08/08
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Gerd Hoffmann, 2008/08/11
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Blue Swirl, 2008/08/11
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Samuel Thibault, 2008/08/08
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Stefano Stabellini, 2008/08/07
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Ian Jackson, 2008/08/11
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/7] merge some xen bits into qemu, Gerd Hoffmann, 2008/08/11