[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license
From: |
Thiemo Seufer |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:11:42 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) |
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <address@hidden>
> "Bill C. Riemers" <address@hidden> writes:
> : According to section 9 of the GPL, you would only have to contact
> : contributors for code which specified version 2 of the GPL and not later...
>
> I said exactly this in a previous message. At one point I recalled
> seeing some code that was gpl2-only in the tree. I can't find it now,
> so either I'm mistaken, or it has gone away.
JFTR, there are hw/ac97.c, hw/acpi.c and hw/pl031.c.
Thiemo
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Bill C. Riemers, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, andrzej zaborowski, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Thiemo Seufer, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Johannes Schindelin, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Thiemo Seufer, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, andrzej zaborowski, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license,
Thiemo Seufer <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Thiemo Seufer, 2008/01/17