qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu hw/ppc_oldworld.c target-ppc/cpu.h target-...


From: Jocelyn Mayer
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu hw/ppc_oldworld.c target-ppc/cpu.h target-...
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:46:21 +0100

On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 19:42 +0100, Jocelyn Mayer wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-23 at 18:22 +0000, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > Furthermore this patch was made in a brainless way, it will be reverted
> > > asap.
> > > If you think there is a bug in someone else code, submit it a patch, if
> > > it's cleaver and addresses a real bug (which is not the case here) it
> > > will be accepted and merged.
> > 
> > The old code before the patch is obviously broken. It's mixing 64-bit 
> > (ppc_gpr_t) and 32-bit (target_ulong) values.
> 
> It seems you do not understand that what was done was correct. It's not
> mixing two different types. GPR are of ppc_gpr_t type and should be
> displayed this way. The only case which is incorrect is not addressed by
> your patch. But your patch breaks the general case which was OK.
> 
> > 
> > As implied by the comments aboce the definition of ppc_gpt_t, and now 
> > explicitly in the above the definition of REGX, printing a ppc_gpr_t is 
> > obviously not meaningful.
> > 
> > I don't claim that my patch is perfect, the code is still a bit of a mess. 
> > However, unlike the original code, it is at least self-consistent, and 
> > won't 
> > crash 64-bit hosts (The fact that it usually prints garbage rather than 
> > crashing is an accident of the x64-64 ABI).
> 
> It's not garbage. On 64 bits hosts, the 64 bits GPR dump is correct. GPR
> _are 64 bits_ when compiling the ppcemb target and should be displayed
> as 64 bits value. It's not correct on 32 bits targets

Sorry, I meant 32 bits _hosts_ here...

> , because the
> highest 32 bits of the GPR should be printed and they are not. Here's
> the real bug. Your patch break the first case, which was OK, and does
> not fix any actual bug.

-- 
Jocelyn Mayer <address@hidden>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]