[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated >2G memory patch
From: |
Paul Brook |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated >2G memory patch |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Sep 2007 16:43:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
> > I'm confused. You say you don't agree with me, then give an example that
> > confirms what I said (Replace Guest OS with machine memory map as
> > appropriate).
>
> What I don't agree is the fact that emulating huge amount of physical
> address space is not immediatly useful.
Ah, ok. I meant immediately useful == benefits targets that currently work. My
understanding is that ppc64 system emulation still some way from meeting that
criteria (large physical address space may be one of the prerequisites for
it).
Paul
- [Qemu-devel] Updated >2G memory patch, Blue Swirl, 2007/09/29
- [Qemu-devel] Re: Updated >2G memory patch, Izik Eidus, 2007/09/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated >2G memory patch, J. Mayer, 2007/09/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated >2G memory patch, Blue Swirl, 2007/09/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated >2G memory patch, J. Mayer, 2007/09/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated >2G memory patch, Avi Kivity, 2007/09/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Updated >2G memory patch, Blue Swirl, 2007/09/30