[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4
From: |
Paul Brook |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4 |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:50:46 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
> > > So given that one of the reasons for doing this would be getting away
> > > from depending on specific and increasily out of date versions of gcc
> > > to build the thing, what would be involved in getting this version to
> > > build under gcc-4.x?
> >
> > Should work pretty much out the box. Obviously if you build anything
> > other than m68k then all bets are off.
>
> It didn't get to "work", it broke building. (The frighting part is that my
> patch at http://busybox.net/downloads/qemu applied to your version without
> rejects, but although that helped it get farther, it didn't finish.)
>
> I just did a standard "./configure --shutupaboutthecompilerversion; make;
> make install". (x86 is the first target I'm interested in, as it's the
> easiest to test and you said it's using at least some of the new code...)
As I said before, the x86 target is a hybrid of the new and old code. ie. if
it didn't work before it probably won't work after. configure
with --target-list=m68k-user and it should work fine with gcc4.
Paul
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Paul Brook, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Paul Brook, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Paul Brook, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Paul Brook, 2006/10/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Paul Brook, 2006/10/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4,
Paul Brook <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Stephen Torri, 2006/10/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Paul Brook, 2006/10/30
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu vs gcc4, Rob Landley, 2006/10/22