[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Stupid (probably) idea wrt dyngen & gcc 3.4 & 4.0

From: Sebastian Kaliszewski
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Stupid (probably) idea wrt dyngen & gcc 3.4 & 4.0
Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 03:55:24 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

So the idea was indeed stupid :)

On Monday 09 May 2005 02:40, Paul Brook wrote:
> No. The main problem with gcc3.4 was that we weren't using FORCE_RET
> everywhere that we should. This has mostly been fixed now.

I see...

> I've got a solution for x86/x86-64 that's 95% complete, using the method
> I suggested in a previous email. 

So, since ret is too small to be replaced with jump, you relocate the block 
following ret few bytes further, and retarget all relevant jumps?

> I hope to be submitting a patch shortly.
> I expect most other hosts (particularly the RISC based ones) to be much
> simpler to fix.


Sebastian Kaliszewski

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]