[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virtual PC
From: |
David Woodhouse |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virtual PC |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Aug 2004 11:56:02 +0100 |
On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 15:08 +0200, J. Mayer wrote:
> Le 9 juil. 04, à 22:07, Natalia Portillo a écrit :
> >
> > > I think that including support for the PowerPC swapping instructions
> > > in QEMU
> > > will break compatibility with host PowerPCs before G3, so that
> > > instructions
> > > should be used in a run-time capability detection scheme.
> > >
>
> On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 14:47, Pierre d'Herbemont wrote:
> > Which PowerPC Implementations? According to The PowerPC Architecture
> > Book, all the implementation 601,603,604,620 should include support for
> > the lwbrx and stwbrx instructions.
>
> I think all PPC include those instructions and gcc already uses them for
> endian-swapping.
I definitely think gcc could do with __attribute__((littleendian)) :)
--
dwmw2
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Inquiry, speed comparison on OS X, QEMU vs Virtual PC,
David Woodhouse <=