[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: Best way to get 6GB = 3 x 2GB + soft raid?
From: |
Ross Kendall Axe |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: Best way to get 6GB = 3 x 2GB + soft raid? |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Aug 2004 06:19:20 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (X11/20040615) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jim C. Brown wrote:
| On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 11:30:11PM +0200, Ronald wrote:
|
|>Le Sun, 01 Aug 2004 22:15:57 +0100, Ross Kendall Axe a ?crit?:
|>
|>
|>>Ronald wrote:
|>>| Le Sun, 01 Aug 2004 12:17:22 -0400, Garth Dahlstrom a ?crit :
|>>|
|>>|
|>>| The next limitation could be your file system if you are using fat with
|>>| an old windows that is 4G, don't know about ntfs.
|>>
|>>2GB actually on FAT32, regardless of Windows version. If the OP is
using a
|>>'doze version that's so old as to not support FAT32, he's screwed anyway
|>>really. I believe NTFS can do better, at least in recent versions.
|>>
|>
|>I think that the 2Gb limitation is true only with linux vfat drivers and
|>win can write files =< 4Gb on fat32.
|
Yes, Windows 2000 and Linux 2.6.3 both seem to be able to write >2GB
files on FAT32. Apologies for the miscorrection.
Ross
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBDc7W9bR4xmappRARAmTPAJ9k+zhwYW88MMNKxSf1neqFdu5sKgCg3RHa
qXX150fbvRV0e9BjfPXjQ2U=
=iJZo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----