qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 16/20] virtio: make it possible to detach host notifier fr


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/20] virtio: make it possible to detach host notifier from any thread
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 23:00:35 +0200

Am 25.04.2023 um 19:27 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> virtio_queue_aio_detach_host_notifier() does two things:
> 1. It removes the fd handler from the event loop.
> 2. It processes the virtqueue one last time.
> 
> The first step can be peformed by any thread and without taking the
> AioContext lock.
> 
> The second step may need the AioContext lock (depending on the device
> implementation) and runs in the thread where request processing takes
> place. virtio-blk and virtio-scsi therefore call
> virtio_queue_aio_detach_host_notifier() from a BH that is scheduled in
> AioContext
> 
> Scheduling a BH is undesirable for .drained_begin() functions. The next
> patch will introduce a .drained_begin() function that needs to call
> virtio_queue_aio_detach_host_notifier().

Why is it undesirable? In my mental model, .drained_begin() is still
free to start as many asynchronous things as it likes. The only
important thing to take care of is that .drained_poll() returns true as
long as the BH (or other asynchronous operation) is still pending.

Of course, your way of doing things still seems to result in simpler
code because you don't have to deal with a BH at all if you only really
want the first part and not the second.

> Move the virtqueue processing out to the callers of
> virtio_queue_aio_detach_host_notifier() so that the function can be
> called from any thread. This is in preparation for the next patch.

Did you forget to remove it in virtio_queue_aio_detach_host_notifier()?
If it's unchanged, I don't think the AioContext requirement is lifted.

> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
> ---
>  hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c | 2 ++
>  hw/scsi/virtio-scsi-dataplane.c | 9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> diff --git a/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
> index b28d81737e..bd7cc6e76b 100644
> --- a/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
> +++ b/hw/block/dataplane/virtio-blk.c
> @@ -286,8 +286,10 @@ static void virtio_blk_data_plane_stop_bh(void *opaque)
>  
>      for (i = 0; i < s->conf->num_queues; i++) {
>          VirtQueue *vq = virtio_get_queue(s->vdev, i);
> +        EventNotifier *host_notifier = virtio_queue_get_host_notifier(vq);
>  
>          virtio_queue_aio_detach_host_notifier(vq, s->ctx);
> +        virtio_queue_host_notifier_read(host_notifier);
>      }
>  }

The existing code in virtio_queue_aio_detach_host_notifier() has a
comment before the read:

    /* Test and clear notifier before after disabling event,
     * in case poll callback didn't have time to run. */

Do we want to keep it around in the new places? (And also fix the
"before after", I suppose, or replace it with a similar, but better
comment that explains why we're reading here.)

Kevin




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]