[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 07/20] graph-lock: Fix GRAPH_RDLOCK_GUARD*() to be reader loc
From: |
Stefan Hajnoczi |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 07/20] graph-lock: Fix GRAPH_RDLOCK_GUARD*() to be reader lock |
Date: |
Mon, 1 May 2023 11:34:41 -0400 |
On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 07:31:45PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> GRAPH_RDLOCK_GUARD() and GRAPH_RDLOCK_GUARD_MAINLOOP() only take a
> reader lock for the graph, so the correct annotation for them to use is
> TSA_ASSERT_SHARED rather than TSA_ASSERT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> ---
> include/block/graph-lock.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/block/graph-lock.h b/include/block/graph-lock.h
> index 7ef391fab3..adaa3ed089 100644
> --- a/include/block/graph-lock.h
> +++ b/include/block/graph-lock.h
> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ typedef struct GraphLockable { } GraphLockable;
> * unlocked. TSA_ASSERT() makes sure that the following calls know that we
Does this comment need to be updated to TSA_ASSERT_SHARED()?
> * hold the lock while unlocking is left unchecked.
> */
> -static inline GraphLockable * TSA_ASSERT(graph_lock) TSA_NO_TSA
> +static inline GraphLockable * TSA_ASSERT_SHARED(graph_lock) TSA_NO_TSA
> graph_lockable_auto_lock(GraphLockable *x)
> {
> bdrv_graph_co_rdlock();
> @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ typedef struct GraphLockableMainloop { }
> GraphLockableMainloop;
> * unlocked. TSA_ASSERT() makes sure that the following calls know that we
Same.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH 07/20] graph-lock: Fix GRAPH_RDLOCK_GUARD*() to be reader lock,
Stefan Hajnoczi <=