[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH 1/2] hw/nvme: consider COPY command in nvme_aio_err
From: |
Minwoo Im |
Subject: |
[PATCH 1/2] hw/nvme: consider COPY command in nvme_aio_err |
Date: |
Fri, 24 Mar 2023 17:35:07 +0900 |
If we don't have NVME_CMD_COPY consideration in the switch statement in
nvme_aio_err(), it will go to have NVME_INTERNAL_DEV_ERROR and
`req->status` will be ovewritten to it. During the aio context, it
might set the NVMe status field like NVME_CMD_SIZE_LIMIT, but it's
overwritten in the nvme_aio_err().
Add consideration for the NVME_CMD_COPY not to overwrite the status at
the end of the function.
Signed-off-by: Minwoo Im <minwoo.im@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Klaus Jensen <k.jensen@samsung.com>
---
hw/nvme/ctrl.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/nvme/ctrl.c b/hw/nvme/ctrl.c
index 49c1210fce..fef5079a71 100644
--- a/hw/nvme/ctrl.c
+++ b/hw/nvme/ctrl.c
@@ -1748,6 +1748,7 @@ static void nvme_aio_err(NvmeRequest *req, int ret)
case NVME_CMD_WRITE:
case NVME_CMD_WRITE_ZEROES:
case NVME_CMD_ZONE_APPEND:
+ case NVME_CMD_COPY:
status = NVME_WRITE_FAULT;
break;
default:
--
2.34.1
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [PATCH 1/2] hw/nvme: consider COPY command in nvme_aio_err,
Minwoo Im <=