Re: [PATCH v1 5/9] hw/virtio: introduce virtio_device_should_start

[Michael S. Tsirkin]

On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 05:55:09PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> 
> 
> Am 14.11.22 um 17:37 schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022 at 05:18:53PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > > Am 08.11.22 um 10:23 schrieb Alex Bennée:
> > > > The previous fix to virtio_device_started revealed a problem in its
> > > > use by both the core and the device code. The core code should be able
> > > > to handle the device "starting" while the VM isn't running to handle
> > > > the restoration of migration state. To solve this dual use introduce a
> > > > new helper for use by the vhost-user backends who all use it to feed a
> > > > should_start variable.
> > > > 
> > > > We can also pick up a change vhost_user_blk_set_status while we are at
> > > > it which follows the same pattern.
> > > > 
> > > > Fixes: 9f6bcfd99f (hw/virtio: move vm_running check to 
> > > > virtio_device_started)
> > > > Fixes: 27ba7b027f (hw/virtio: add boilerplate for vhost-user-gpio 
> > > > device)
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> > > > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > Hmmm, is this
> > > commit 259d69c00b67c02a67f3bdbeeea71c2c0af76c35
> > > Author:     Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> > > AuthorDate: Mon Nov 7 12:14:07 2022 +0000
> > > Commit:     Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > > CommitDate: Mon Nov 7 14:08:18 2022 -0500
> > > 
> > >      hw/virtio: introduce virtio_device_should_start
> > > 
> > > and older version?
> > 
> > This is what got merged:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221107121407.1010913-1-alex.bennee%40linaro.org
> > This patch was sent after I merged the RFC.
> > I think the only difference is the commit log but I might be missing
> > something.
> > 
> > > This does not seem to fix the regression that I have reported.
> > 
> > This was applied on top of 9f6bcfd99f which IIUC does, right?
> > 
> > 
> 
> QEMU master still fails for me for suspend/resume to disk:
> 
> #0  0x000003ff8e3980a6 in __pthread_kill_implementation () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> #1  0x000003ff8e348580 in raise () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> #2  0x000003ff8e32b5c0 in abort () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> #3  0x000003ff8e3409da in __assert_fail_base () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> #4  0x000003ff8e340a4e in  () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> #5  0x000002aa1ffa8966 in vhost_vsock_common_pre_save (opaque=<optimized 
> out>) at ../hw/virtio/vhost-vsock-common.c:203
> #6  0x000002aa1fe5e0ee in vmstate_save_state_v
>     (f=f@entry=0x2aa21bdc170, vmsd=0x2aa204ac5f0 
> <vmstate_virtio_vhost_vsock>, opaque=0x2aa21bac9f8, 
> vmdesc=vmdesc@entry=0x3fddc08eb30, version_id=version_id@entry=0) at 
> ../migration/vmstate.c:329
> #7  0x000002aa1fe5ebf8 in vmstate_save_state (f=f@entry=0x2aa21bdc170, 
> vmsd=<optimized out>, opaque=<optimized out>, 
> vmdesc_id=vmdesc_id@entry=0x3fddc08eb30) at ../migration/vmstate.c:317
> #8  0x000002aa1fe75bd0 in vmstate_save (f=f@entry=0x2aa21bdc170, 
> se=se@entry=0x2aa21bdbe90, vmdesc=vmdesc@entry=0x3fddc08eb30) at 
> ../migration/savevm.c:908
> #9  0x000002aa1fe79584 in qemu_savevm_state_complete_precopy_non_iterable 
> (f=f@entry=0x2aa21bdc170, in_postcopy=in_postcopy@entry=false, 
> inactivate_disks=inactivate_disks@entry=true)
>     at ../migration/savevm.c:1393
> #10 0x000002aa1fe79a96 in qemu_savevm_state_complete_precopy 
> (f=0x2aa21bdc170, iterable_only=iterable_only@entry=false, 
> inactivate_disks=inactivate_disks@entry=true) at ../migration/savevm.c:1459
> #11 0x000002aa1fe6d6ee in migration_completion (s=0x2aa218ef600) at 
> ../migration/migration.c:3314
> #12 migration_iteration_run (s=0x2aa218ef600) at ../migration/migration.c:3761
> #13 migration_thread (opaque=opaque@entry=0x2aa218ef600) at 
> ../migration/migration.c:3989
> #14 0x000002aa201f0b8c in qemu_thread_start (args=<optimized out>) at 
> ../util/qemu-thread-posix.c:505
> #15 0x000003ff8e396248 in start_thread () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> #16 0x000003ff8e41183e in thread_start () at /lib64/libc.so.6
> 
> Michael, your previous branch did work if I recall correctly.

That one was failing under github CI though (for reasons we didn't
really address, such as disconnect during stop causing a recursive
call to stop, but there you are).

-- 
MST