Re: [PATCH v7 10/18] jobs: rename static functions called with job_mutex held

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 6/24/22 16:29, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Yes, I think Vladimir is having the same difficulties with reading the
> series as I had. And I believe his suggestion would make the
> intermediate states less impossible to review. The question is how much
> work it would be and whether you're willing to do this. As I said, if
> reorganising is too hard, I'm okay with just ignoring the intermediate
> state and reviewing the series as if it were a single patch.

I think we've tried different intermediate states for each of the 
previous 6 versions, and none of them were really satisfactory. :(

Paolo