qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Removal of AioContext lock, bs->parents and ->childr


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Removal of AioContext lock, bs->parents and ->children: proof of concept
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 11:41:04 +0200



On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 11:25 AM Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> wrote:
- The new API doesn't stop more I/O requests from being submitted, it
  just blocks the current coroutine so request processing is deferred.

New I/O requests would not complete until the write-side critical section ends. However they would still be accepted: from the point of view of the guest, the "consumed" index of the virtio ring would move forward, unlike bdrv_drained_begin/end().

- In other words, is_external is a flow control API whereas the new API
  queues up request coroutines without notifying the caller.

Yes, I think this is the same I wrote above.
- The new API still needs to be combined with bdrv_drained_begin/end()
  to ensure in-flight requests are done.

I don't think so, because in-flight requests would take the lock for reading. The write side would not start until those in-flight requests release the lock.

- It's not obvious to me whether the new API obsoletes is_external. I think it probably doesn't.

I agree that it doesn't. This new lock is only protecting ->parents and ->children. bdrv_drained_begin()/end() remains necessary, for example, when you need to send a request during the drained section. An example is block_resize.

In addition, bdrv_drained_begin()/end() ensures that the callback of blk_aio_*() functions has been invoked (see commit 46aaf2a566, "block-backend: Decrease in_flight only after callback", 2018-09-25).  This new lock would not ensure that.

As an aside, instead of is_external, QEMU could remove/add the ioeventfd handler in the blk->dev_ops->drained_begin and blk->dev_ops->drained_end callbacks respectively. But that's just a code cleanup.

Paolo

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]