qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] tests/qemu-iotests/testrunner: Allow parallel test in


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] tests/qemu-iotests/testrunner: Allow parallel test invocations
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:53:55 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0

On 11/02/2022 10.29, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 09.02.2022 um 11:15 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben:
If multiple tests run in parallel, they must use unique file
names for the test output.

Suggested-by: Hanna Reitz <hreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
  tests/qemu-iotests/testrunner.py | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/testrunner.py b/tests/qemu-iotests/testrunner.py
index 0eace147b8..9d20f51bb1 100644
--- a/tests/qemu-iotests/testrunner.py
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/testrunner.py
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ def do_run_test(self, test: str, mp: bool) -> TestResult:
          """
f_test = Path(test)
-        f_bad = Path(f_test.name + '.out.bad')
+        f_bad = Path(f'{os.getpid()}-{f_test.name}.out.bad')
          f_notrun = Path(f_test.name + '.notrun')
          f_casenotrun = Path(f_test.name + '.casenotrun')
          f_reference = Path(self.find_reference(test))

Hmm... It does make sense, but nobody ever cleans those files up.
Currently, the next run of the test will just overwrite the existing
file or delete it when the test succeeds. So after running the test
suite, you have .out.bad files for every failed test, but not for those
that succeeded.

After this change, won't the test directory accumulate tons of .out.bad
files over time?

True ... but we certainly want to keep the file for failed tests for further analysis instead of immediately deleting them ... maybe it would be enough to encode the image format (qcow2, qed, vmdk, ...) into the output name, instead of using the PID, so that "make check SPEED=thorough" works as expected here?

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]