Re: [PATCH V2 for-6.2 0/2] fixes for bdrv_co_block_status

[Stefano Garzarella]

On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 10:19:27AM +0100, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 19.01.22 um 15:57 schrieb Stefano Garzarella:
> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 11:58:40AM +0100, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 3:44 PM Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de> wrote:
> > > > V1->V2:
> > > >  Patch 1: Treat a hole just like an unallocated area. [Ilya]
> > > >  Patch 2: Apply workaround only for pre-Quincy librbd versions and
> > > >           ensure default striping and non child images. [Ilya]
> > > >
> > > > Peter Lieven (2):
> > > >   block/rbd: fix handling of holes in .bdrv_co_block_status
> > > >   block/rbd: workaround for ceph issue #53784
> > > >
> > > >  block/rbd.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > >  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > >
> > > These patches have both "for-6.2" in the subject and
> > > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org in the description, which is a little
> > > confusing.  Just want to clarify that they should go into master
> > > and be backported to 6.2.
> >
> > Yeah, a bit confusing. These are for 7.0, so @Kevin can these patches go with 
> > your tree?
>
>
> Yes, sorry, my fault. It should be 7.0

Don't worry :-)

What about sending a v3 fixing the version tag (I think you can just 
remove for-6.2), the extra space in the comment, and the Fixes tag on 
patch 2?

If you will send v3, remember to report the R-b/T-b tags received in 
this version from me and Ilya.

Thanks,
Stefano