|
| From: | Thomas Huth |
| Subject: | Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense? |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Nov 2021 10:19:26 +0100 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0 |
On 03/11/2021 09.41, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:Does it make sense for a device/board to do drive_get_next(IF_NONE) ?Short answer: hell, no! ;)
Would it make sense to add an "assert(type != IF_NONE)" to drive_get() to avoid such mistakes in the future?
Thomas
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |