qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[RFC PATCH 2/4] migration: block-dirty-bitmap: add missing qemu_mutex_lo


From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/4] migration: block-dirty-bitmap: add missing qemu_mutex_lock_iothread
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2021 09:10:19 -0400

init_dirty_bitmap_migration assumes the iothread lock (BQL)
to be held, but instead it isn't.

Instead of adding the lock to qemu_savevm_state_setup(),
follow the same pattern as the other ->save_setup callbacks
and lock+unlock inside dirty_bitmap_save_setup().

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
---
 migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
index 35f5ef688d..9aba7d9c22 100644
--- a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
+++ b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
@@ -1215,7 +1215,10 @@ static int dirty_bitmap_save_setup(QEMUFile *f, void 
*opaque)
 {
     DBMSaveState *s = &((DBMState *)opaque)->save;
     SaveBitmapState *dbms = NULL;
+
+    qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
     if (init_dirty_bitmap_migration(s) < 0) {
+        qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
         return -1;
     }
 
@@ -1223,7 +1226,7 @@ static int dirty_bitmap_save_setup(QEMUFile *f, void 
*opaque)
         send_bitmap_start(f, s, dbms);
     }
     qemu_put_bitmap_flags(f, DIRTY_BITMAP_MIG_FLAG_EOS);
-
+    qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
     return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.27.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]