Re: [RFC PATCH 06/10] hw/sd: Add sd_cmd_unimplemented() handler

[Bin Meng]

On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 10:28 PM Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
>  hw/sd/sd.c | 21 ++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/sd/sd.c b/hw/sd/sd.c
> index 0215bdb3689..2647fd26566 100644
> --- a/hw/sd/sd.c
> +++ b/hw/sd/sd.c
> @@ -973,6 +973,15 @@ static sd_rsp_type_t sd_cmd_illegal(SDState *sd, 
> SDRequest req)
>      return sd_illegal;
>  }
>
> +/* Commands that are recognised but not yet implemented. */
> +static sd_rsp_type_t sd_cmd_unimplemented(SDState *sd, SDRequest req)
> +{
> +    qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "%s: CMD%i not implemented\n",
> +                  sd->proto->name, req.cmd);
> +
> +    return sd_illegal;
> +}
> +
>  static sd_rsp_type_t sd_normal_command(SDState *sd, SDRequest req)
>  {
>      uint32_t rca = 0x0000;
> @@ -1522,9 +1531,6 @@ static sd_rsp_type_t sd_app_command(SDState *sd,
>
>      switch (req.cmd) {
>      case 6:    /* ACMD6:  SET_BUS_WIDTH */
> -        if (sd->spi) {
> -            goto unimplemented_spi_cmd;
> -        }
>          switch (sd->state) {
>          case sd_transfer_state:
>              sd->sd_status[0] &= 0x3f;
> @@ -1655,12 +1661,6 @@ static sd_rsp_type_t sd_app_command(SDState *sd,
>      default:
>          /* Fall back to standard commands.  */
>          return sd_normal_command(sd, req);
> -
> -    unimplemented_spi_cmd:
> -        /* Commands that are recognised but not yet implemented in SPI mode. 
>  */
> -        qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "SD: CMD%i not implemented in SPI mode\n",
> -                      req.cmd);
> -        return sd_illegal;
>      }
>
>      qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "SD: ACMD%i in a wrong state\n", req.cmd);
> @@ -2096,6 +2096,9 @@ static const SDProto sd_proto_spi = {
>          [26]        = sd_cmd_illegal,
>          [52 ... 54] = sd_cmd_illegal,
>      },
> +    .cmd = {
> +        [6]         = sd_cmd_unimplemented,
> +    },
>  };

Does this compile? Or is this another GCC extension to C?

But I think you wanted to say .acmd = ?

Regards,
Bin