qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] block-copy: improve comments of BlockCopyTask and Blo


From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] block-copy: improve comments of BlockCopyTask and BlockCopyState types and functions
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 12:12:04 +0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0

08.06.2021 10:33, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
As done in BlockCopyCallState, categorize BlockCopyTask
and BlockCopyState in IN, State and OUT fields.
This is just to understand which field has to be protected with a lock.

.sleep_state is handled in the series "coroutine: new sleep/wake API"
and thus here left as TODO.

Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@redhat.com>
---
  block/block-copy.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/block-copy.c b/block/block-copy.c
index d58051288b..b3533a3003 100644
--- a/block/block-copy.c
+++ b/block/block-copy.c
@@ -56,25 +56,33 @@ typedef struct BlockCopyCallState {
      QLIST_ENTRY(BlockCopyCallState) list;
/* State */

Why previous @list field is not in the state? For sure it's not an IN parameter 
and should be protected somehow.

-    int ret;
      bool finished;
-    QemuCoSleep sleep;
-    bool cancelled;
+    QemuCoSleep sleep; /* TODO: protect API with a lock */
/* OUT parameters */
+    bool cancelled;
      bool error_is_read;
+    int ret;
  } BlockCopyCallState;
typedef struct BlockCopyTask {
      AioTask task;
+ /*
+     * IN parameters. Initialized in block_copy_task_create()
+     * and never changed.
+     */
      BlockCopyState *s;
      BlockCopyCallState *call_state;
      int64_t offset;
-    int64_t bytes;
-    BlockCopyMethod method;
-    QLIST_ENTRY(BlockCopyTask) list;
+    int64_t bytes; /* only re-set in task_shrink, before running the task */
+    BlockCopyMethod method; /* initialized in block_copy_dirty_clusters() */

hmm. to be precise method is initialized in block_copy_task_create.

And after block_copy_task_create finished, task is in the list and can be read 
by parallel block_copy_dirty_clusters(). So, @bytes is part of State, we must 
protect it..

method is only read by block_copy_task_entry(), so can be modified without any 
protection before running the task.

+
+    /* State */
      CoQueue wait_queue; /* coroutines blocked on this task */
+
+    /* To reference all call states from BlockCopyState */

That's a misleading comment.. not all sates but all tasks. I don't think we 
need this new comment, just keep @list in State section.

+    QLIST_ENTRY(BlockCopyTask) list;
  } BlockCopyTask;
static int64_t task_end(BlockCopyTask *task)
@@ -90,15 +98,25 @@ typedef struct BlockCopyState {
       */
      BdrvChild *source;
      BdrvChild *target;
-    BdrvDirtyBitmap *copy_bitmap;
+
+    /* State */
      int64_t in_flight_bytes;
-    int64_t cluster_size;
      BlockCopyMethod method;
-    int64_t max_transfer;
-    uint64_t len;
      QLIST_HEAD(, BlockCopyTask) tasks; /* All tasks from all block-copy calls 
*/
      QLIST_HEAD(, BlockCopyCallState) calls;
+    /* State fields that use a thread-safe API */
+    BdrvDirtyBitmap *copy_bitmap;
+    ProgressMeter *progress;
+    SharedResource *mem;
+    RateLimit rate_limit;
+ /*
+     * IN parameters. Initialized in block_copy_state_new()
+     * and never changed.
+     */
+    int64_t cluster_size;
+    int64_t max_transfer;
+    uint64_t len;
      BdrvRequestFlags write_flags;
/*
@@ -114,14 +132,11 @@ typedef struct BlockCopyState {
       * In this case, block_copy() will query the source’s allocation status,
       * skip unallocated regions, clear them in the copy_bitmap, and invoke
       * block_copy_reset_unallocated() every time it does.
+     *
+     * This field is set in backup_run() before coroutines are run,
+     * therefore is an IN.
       */
      bool skip_unallocated;
-
-    ProgressMeter *progress;
-
-    SharedResource *mem;
-
-    RateLimit rate_limit;
  } BlockCopyState;
static BlockCopyTask *find_conflicting_task(BlockCopyState *s,



--
Best regards,
Vladimir



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]