qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH for-6.0? 1/3] job: Add job_wait_unpaused() for block-job-comp


From: Max Reitz
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-6.0? 1/3] job: Add job_wait_unpaused() for block-job-complete
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 11:38:32 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0

On 08.04.21 18:58, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
08.04.2021 19:20, Max Reitz wrote:
block-job-complete can only be applied when the job is READY, not when
it is on STANDBY (ready, but paused).  Draining a job technically pauses
it (which makes a READY job enter STANDBY), and ending the drained
section does not synchronously resume it, but only schedules the job,
which will then be resumed.  So attempting to complete a job immediately
after a drained section may sometimes fail.

That is bad at least because users cannot really work nicely around
this: A job may be paused and resumed at any time, so waiting for the
job to be in the READY state and then issuing a block-job-complete poses
a TOCTTOU problem.  The only way around it would be to issue
block-job-complete until it no longer fails due to the job being in the
STANDBY state, but that would not be nice.

We can solve the problem by allowing block-job-complete to be invoked on
jobs that are on STANDBY, if that status is the result of a drained
section (not because the user has paused the job), and that section has
ended.  That is, if the job is on STANDBY, but scheduled to be resumed.

Perhaps we could actually just directly allow this, seeing that mirror
is the only user of ready/complete, and that mirror_complete() could
probably work under the given circumstances, but there may be many side
effects to consider.

It is simpler to add a function job_wait_unpaused() that waits for the
job to be resumed (under said circumstances), and to make
qmp_block_job_complete() use it to delay job_complete() until then.

Buglink: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945635
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
---
  include/qemu/job.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
  blockdev.c         |  3 +++
  job.c              | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  3 files changed, 60 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/qemu/job.h b/include/qemu/job.h
index efc6fa7544..cf3082b6d7 100644
--- a/include/qemu/job.h
+++ b/include/qemu/job.h
@@ -563,4 +563,19 @@ void job_dismiss(Job **job, Error **errp);
   */
  int job_finish_sync(Job *job, void (*finish)(Job *, Error **errp), Error **errp);
+/**
+ * If the job has been paused because of a drained section, and that
+ * section has ended, wait until the job is resumed.
+ *
+ * Return 0 if the job is not paused, or if it has been successfully
+ * resumed.
+ * Return an error if the job has been paused in such a way that
+ * waiting will not resume it, i.e. if it has been paused by the user,
+ * or if it is still drained.
+ *
+ * Callers must be in the home AioContext and hold the AioContext lock
+ * of job->aio_context.
+ */
+int job_wait_unpaused(Job *job, Error **errp);
+
  #endif
diff --git a/blockdev.c b/blockdev.c
index a57590aae4..c0cc2fa364 100644
--- a/blockdev.c
+++ b/blockdev.c
@@ -3414,6 +3414,9 @@ void qmp_block_job_complete(const char *device, Error **errp)
          return;
      }
+    if (job_wait_unpaused(&job->job, errp) < 0) {
+        return;
+    }
      trace_qmp_block_job_complete(job);
      job_complete(&job->job, errp);
      aio_context_release(aio_context);
diff --git a/job.c b/job.c
index 289edee143..1ea30fd294 100644
--- a/job.c
+++ b/job.c
@@ -1023,3 +1023,45 @@ int job_finish_sync(Job *job, void (*finish)(Job *, Error **errp), Error **errp)
      job_unref(job);
      return ret;
  }
+
+int job_wait_unpaused(Job *job, Error **errp)
+{
+    /*
+     * Only run this function from the main context, because this is
+     * what we need, and this way we do not have to think about what
+     * happens if the user concurrently pauses the job from the main
+     * monitor.
+     */
+    assert(qemu_get_current_aio_context() == qemu_get_aio_context());
+
+    /*
+     * Quick path (e.g. so we do not get an error if pause_count > 0
+     * but the job is not even paused)
+     */
+    if (!job->paused) {
+        return 0;
+    }
+
+    /* If the user has paused the job, waiting will not help */
+    if (job->user_paused) {
+        error_setg(errp, "Job '%s' has been paused by the user", job->id);
+        return -EBUSY;
+    }
+
+    /* Similarly, if the job is still drained, waiting will not help either */
+    if (job->pause_count > 0) {
+        error_setg(errp, "Job '%s' is blocked and cannot be unpaused", job->id);
+        return -EBUSY;
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * This function is specifically for waiting for a job to be
+     * resumed after a drained section.  Ending the drained section
+     * includes a job_enter(), which schedules the job loop to be run,
+     * and once it does, job->paused will be cleared.  Therefore, we
+     * do not need to invoke job_enter() here.
+     */
+    AIO_WAIT_WHILE(job->aio_context, job->paused);
+
+    return 0;
+}


Hmm.. It seems that when job->pause_count becomes 0, job_enter is called, and the period when pause_count is 0 but paused is still true should be relatively shot.

Yes.

And patch doesn't help if user call job-complete during drained section.

Is that possible?

(If the drained section is in some IO thread, I suppose we could drop the pause_count condition as I wrote in my reply to John. Because if some IO thread has drained the job, waiting will help.)

So it looks like the patch will help relatively seldom.. Or I'm missing something?

No, you’re right. The condition is rather rare. Which I think is good because it means that block-job-complete having to wait for a job will be a rare occurrence.

I have a Ruby test script that can reproduce it sometimes, but I’m not sure that it will reproduce the problem on others’ machines at all. I’ll try to rewrite it as a Python iotest so you can try for yourself.

job-complete command is async. Can we instead just add a boolean like job->completion_requested, and set it if job-complete called in STANDBY state, and on job_resume job_complete will be called automatically if this boolean is true?

job-complete is not async, it can return errors, and mirror_complete() has several paths that do so. What would you do with those errors? I can only imagine sending an event (which would be ignored by existing management software) or failing the block job (which seems wrong, but perhaps would be the right thing to do).

The problem is that when block-job-complete returns success, a BLOCK_JOB_COMPLETE is bound to follow at some point (unless the job runs into an error, or it cannot converge). This contract would be broken (unless we let mirror_complete() fail the whole block job).

Max




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]