qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 4/7] iotests/129: Use throttle node


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] iotests/129: Use throttle node
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 08:53:53 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0

On 1/13/21 8:10 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 13.01.21 15:06, Max Reitz wrote:
>> Throttling on the BB has not affected block jobs in a while, so it is
>> possible that one of the jobs in 129 finishes before the VM is stopped.
>> We can fix that by running the job from a throttle node.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/qemu-iotests/129 | 39 +++++++++++++++------------------------
>>   1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>>

>>           result = self.vm.qmp("stop")
>>           self.assert_qmp(result, 'return', {})
>>           result = self.vm.qmp("query-block-jobs")
>> +
>>           self.assert_qmp(result, 'return[0]/status', 'running')
>>           self.assert_qmp(result, 'return[0]/ready', False)
>>   +        self.vm.qmp("block-job-cancel", device="drive0", force=True)
>> +
> 
> Sorry, somewhere along the way I forgot to remove this block-job-cancel.
>  It’s still from
> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-block/2019-06/msg00499.html
> and I don’t know why I added it there.  It should probably go.
> 
> ('stop' should have drained, that’s the point, so there shouldn’t be any
> further delay if we quit the VM without cancelling the job.)

Since the test still passes without the added block-job-cancel, I'm fine
with removing that line then adding:

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]