[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] qapi: Use QAPI_LIST_APPEND in trivial cases
From: |
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] qapi: Use QAPI_LIST_APPEND in trivial cases |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Dec 2020 12:56:09 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 |
24.12.2020 01:11, Eric Blake wrote:
The easiest spots to use QAPI_LIST_APPEND are where we already have an
obvious pointer to the tail of a list. While at it, consistently use
the variable name 'tail' for that purpose.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
---
[..]
--- a/monitor/qmp-cmds-control.c
+++ b/monitor/qmp-cmds-control.c
@@ -104,17 +104,16 @@ VersionInfo *qmp_query_version(Error **errp)
static void query_commands_cb(const QmpCommand *cmd, void *opaque)
{
- CommandInfoList *info, **list = opaque;
+ CommandInfo *info;
+ CommandInfoList **tail = opaque;
if (!cmd->enabled) {
return;
}
info = g_malloc0(sizeof(*info));
- info->value = g_malloc0(sizeof(*info->value));
- info->value->name = g_strdup(cmd->name);
- info->next = *list;
- *list = info;
+ info->name = g_strdup(cmd->name);
+ QAPI_LIST_APPEND(tail, info);
Original logic is prepend in this hunk.
Without this hunk:
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
}
CommandInfoList *qmp_query_commands(Error **errp)
[..]
--- a/target/i386/cpu.c
+++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
@@ -4817,20 +4817,17 @@ static void x86_cpu_filter_features(X86CPU *cpu, bool
verbose);
/* Build a list with the name of all features on a feature word array */
static void x86_cpu_list_feature_names(FeatureWordArray features,
- strList **feat_names)
+ strList **tail)
{
FeatureWord w;
- strList **next = feat_names;
for (w = 0; w < FEATURE_WORDS; w++) {
uint64_t filtered = features[w];
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) {
if (filtered & (1ULL << i)) {
- strList *new = g_new0(strList, 1);
- new->value = g_strdup(x86_cpu_feature_name(w, i));
- *next = new;
- next = &new->next;
+ QAPI_LIST_APPEND(tail,
+ g_strdup(x86_cpu_feature_name(w, i)));
actually, fit in one line...
}
}
}
[..]
--
Best regards,
Vladimir