qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PULL 28/34] block/file-posix: fix workaround in raw_do_pwrite_zeroes()


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: [PULL 28/34] block/file-posix: fix workaround in raw_do_pwrite_zeroes()
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 18:08:06 +0100

From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>

We should not set overlap_bytes:

1. Don't worry: it is calculated by bdrv_mark_request_serialising() and
   will be equal to or greater than bytes anyway.

2. If the request was already aligned up to some greater alignment,
   than we may break things: we reduce overlap_bytes, and further
   bdrv_mark_request_serialising() may not help, as it will not restore
   old bigger alignment.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Message-Id: <20201203222713.13507-2-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
---
 block/file-posix.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/file-posix.c b/block/file-posix.c
index 806764f7e3..9bee3d88d0 100644
--- a/block/file-posix.c
+++ b/block/file-posix.c
@@ -2952,7 +2952,6 @@ raw_do_pwrite_zeroes(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t 
offset, int bytes,
 
         end = INT64_MAX & -(uint64_t)bs->bl.request_alignment;
         req->bytes = end - req->offset;
-        req->overlap_bytes = req->bytes;
 
         bdrv_mark_request_serialising(req, bs->bl.request_alignment);
     }
-- 
2.29.2




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]