Re: [PATCH 14/16] cirrus: Building freebsd in a single short

[Daniel P . Berrangé]

On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 04:24:00PM +0800, 罗勇刚(Yonggang Luo) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 4:17 PM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 03:48:18AM +0800, Yonggang Luo wrote:
> > > freebsd 1 hour limit not hit anymore
> >
> > How long does the combined job take with this change ? If it is
> > within 10 minutes of the limit, then we still want the split, as
> > transient changes in the CI system can push it over the limit
> > making the test unreliable.
> >
> I think we going to a wrong direction, I think there is some tests a stall
> the test runner,
> please look at
> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/5110577531977728
> When its running properly, the consumed time are little, but when tests
> running too long, look at the cpu
> usage, the cpu usage are nearly zero. does't consuming time.
> 
> And look at
> https://cirrus-ci.com/task/6119341601062912
> 
> If the tests running properly, the time consuming are little
> 
> We should not hide the error by split them

Ok, please explain this in the commit message so reviewers know why the
change is intentionally reverting the previous split.


Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|