[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] iotests: rename and move 169 and 199 tests
|
From: |
John Snow |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] iotests: rename and move 169 and 199 tests |
|
Date: |
Fri, 29 May 2020 15:37:04 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 |
On 5/27/20 2:50 PM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>
> Hmm. Actually, I think, it's not a problem to continue support ranges of
> tests for number test names, if you need it.
>
> Note a new paramter --start-from, which is here to re-run failed
> ./check run from the middle of the process, is it your use-case or not?
Yeah, that'll solve that for me! I pretty much care only about excluding
tests sometimes, and running ranges was just a way to do that.
- [PATCH v4 7/9] iotests: add testrunner.py, (continued)
- [PATCH v4 7/9] iotests: add testrunner.py, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2020/05/15
- [PATCH v4 8/9] iotests: rewrite check into python, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2020/05/15
- [PATCH v4 9/9] iotests: rename and move 169 and 199 tests, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2020/05/15
- Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] iotests: rename and move 169 and 199 tests, Thomas Huth, 2020/05/18
- Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] iotests: rename and move 169 and 199 tests, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2020/05/18
- Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] iotests: rename and move 169 and 199 tests, Kevin Wolf, 2020/05/19
- Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] iotests: rename and move 169 and 199 tests, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2020/05/19
- Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] iotests: rename and move 169 and 199 tests, Kevin Wolf, 2020/05/19
- Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] iotests: rename and move 169 and 199 tests, John Snow, 2020/05/21
- Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] iotests: rename and move 169 and 199 tests, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2020/05/27
- Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] iotests: rename and move 169 and 199 tests,
John Snow <=
[PATCH v4 4/9] iotests: define group in each iotest, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2020/05/15