qemu-block
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] qcow2: Support BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE for truncate


From: Eric Blake
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/9] qcow2: Support BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE for truncate
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:14:11 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0

On 4/22/20 10:58 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:

@@ -4214,6 +4215,35 @@ static int coroutine_fn 
qcow2_co_truncate(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t offset,
           g_assert_not_reached();
       }
+    if ((flags & BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE) && offset > old_length) {
+        uint64_t zero_start = QEMU_ALIGN_UP(old_length, s->cluster_size);
+        uint64_t zero_end = QEMU_ALIGN_UP(offset, s->cluster_size);

This rounds up beyond the new size...

+
+        /* Use zero clusters as much as we can */
+        ret = qcow2_cluster_zeroize(bs, zero_start, zero_end - zero_start, 0);

and then requests that the extra be zeroed.  Does that always work, even
when it results in pdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes beyond the end of s->data_file?

You mean the data_file_is_raw() path in qcow2_cluster_zeroize()? It's
currently not a code path that is run because we only set
BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE for truncate if the image has a backing file, and
data_file_is_raw() doesn't work with backing files.

Good point.


But hypothetically, if someone called truncate with BDRV_REQ_ZERO_WRITE
for such a file, I think it would fail.

If so,

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <address@hidden>

otherwise, you may have to treat the tail specially, the same way you
treated an unaligned head.

Actually, do I even need to round the tail?

     /* Caller must pass aligned values, except at image end */
     assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(offset, s->cluster_size));
     assert(QEMU_IS_ALIGNED(end_offset, s->cluster_size) ||
            end_offset == bs->total_sectors << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS);

So qcow2_cluster_zeroize() seems to accept the unaligned tail. It would
still set the zero flag for the partial last cluster and for the
external data file, bdrv_co_pwrite_zeroes() would have the correct size.

Then I'm in favor of NOT rounding the tail. That's an easy enough change and we've now justified that it does what we want, so R-b stands with that one-line tweak.

--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]